1030 vs 2202: Seazen Group Ltd vs China Vanke Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in Hong Kong.
10
1030•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$2.19
+1.39%
2202•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$3.07
+0.66%
Quick Summary
China Vanke Co Ltd is 3.4× the market cap of Seazen Group Ltd. 2202 trades at a lower P/E than 1030.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1030 | 2202 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$2.19 | HK$3.07 |
| Daily Change | 1.39% | 0.66% |
| 1-Year Return | 5.29% | -47.97% |
| 52-Week High | HK$2.81 | HK$5.88 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$1.85 | HK$2.88 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$2.23 | HK$3.40 |
| 200-Day MA | HK$2.34 | HK$4.28 |
| Beta | 2.31 | 0.85 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1030 | 2202 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $15.64B | $52.62B |
| Enterprise Value | $75.91B | $371.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $53.14B | $233.43B |
| Shares Outstanding | 7.24B | 2.21B |
| Float | 2.66B | 8.68B |
| Employees | 18,954 | 127,638 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1030 | 2202 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 30.86 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | 19.76 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 0.17 |
| Price / Sales | 0.29 | 0.23 |
| Price / Book | 0.29 | 0.27 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.16 | 22.44 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1030 | 2202 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 0.74% | -37.94% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 13.41% | -82.99% |
| Return on Equity | 0.38% | -27.68% |
| Return on Assets | 1.55% | -0.88% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.03 | -10.43 |
Growth
| Metric | 1030 | 2202 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -43.90% | -41.60% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -27.90% | -23.70% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1030 | 2202 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.57 | -1.47 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 5.74 | 2.12 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.57 | -1.47 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6100 | 0.5361 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | 2/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #16,783 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 1030 | 2202 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6369.10% | 0.00% |
| % Institutions | 518.80% | 2578.40% |
Compare 1030 to peers
Compare 2202 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.