0688 vs 1925: China Overseas vs DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
0688•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$12.54
+0.16%
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 24.3× the market cap of China Overseas. 0688 pays a dividend; 1925 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 0688 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$12.54 | ¥4,852.00 |
| Daily Change | 0.16% | -1.36% |
| 1-Year Return | -12.80% | -4.80% |
| 52-Week High | HK$15.04 | ¥5,710.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$11.55 | ¥4,763.31 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$13.19 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$13.49 | — |
| Beta | 0.47 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 0688 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $134.18B | $3.26T |
| Enterprise Value | $299.91B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $168.09B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 10.94B | — |
| Float | 3.70B | — |
| Employees | 3,232 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 0688 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 9.22 | — |
| Forward P/E | 7.30 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.47 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.80 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.30 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.25 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 0688 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 7.55% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.21% | — |
| Return on Equity | 3.27% | — |
| Return on Assets | 1.41% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.28 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 0688 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -13.60% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -23.10% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 0688 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.65% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.45 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 0688 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.45 | -1.59 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 2.24 | -1.32 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.22 | -4.41 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5675 | 0.5586 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #19,073 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 0688 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6615.40% | — |
| % Institutions | 1809.20% | — |
Compare 0688 to peers
Compare 1925 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.