0659 vs 1803: NWS Holdings Ltd vs SHIMIZU CORPORATION
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
06
0659•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$8.10
+0.00%
1803•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥2,758.00
-4.86%
Quick Summary
SHIMIZU CORPORATION is 50.0× the market cap of NWS Holdings Ltd. 0659 pays a dividend; 1803 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 0659 | 1803 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$8.10 | ¥2,758.00 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | -4.86% |
| 1-Year Return | 16.21% | 96.96% |
| 52-Week High | HK$9.56 | ¥3,578.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$6.97 | ¥1,394.34 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$8.68 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$7.81 | — |
| Beta | 0.47 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 0659 | 1803 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $36.98B | $1.85T |
| Enterprise Value | $38.09B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25.00B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 4.57B | — |
| Float | 1.20B | — |
| Employees | 10,800 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 0659 | 1803 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 15.58 | — |
| Forward P/E | 8.21 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.66 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.48 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.91 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.90 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 0659 | 1803 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 10.10% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 7.20% | — |
| Return on Equity | 6.16% | — |
| Return on Assets | 0.67% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.47 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 0659 | 1803 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.90% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 13.10% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 0659 | 1803 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.99% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.57 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 0659 | 1803 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.93 | 2.30 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.56 | 1.40 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.46 | 1.34 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6420 | 0.7233 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #17,804 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 0659 | 1803 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 7262.90% | — |
| % Institutions | 294.30% | — |
Compare 0659 to peers
Compare 1803 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.