Home 0656 vs CTPCY 0656 vs CTPCY: Fosun International Ltd vs Citic Ltd ADR Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
06
0656 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary Citic Ltd ADR is 1.2× the market cap of Fosun International Ltd. 0656 trades at a lower P/E than CTPCY. CTPCY offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 0656 CTPCY Current Price HK$4.17 $8.50 Daily Change -1.18% 0.00% 1-Year Return 4.25% 48.16% 52-Week High HK$6.05 $8.50 52-Week Low HK$3.59 $5.75 50-Day MA HK$3.94 $7.76 200-Day MA HK$4.74 $7.42 Beta 0.51 0.91
Size & Revenue Metric 0656 CTPCY Market Cap $32.85B $39.45B Enterprise Value $154.79B $248.65B Revenue (TTM) $173.43B $964.02B Shares Outstanding 8.13B 5.82B Float 2.21B 4.94B Employees 98,400 190,763
Valuation Metric 0656 CTPCY Trailing P/E 0.00 4.77 Forward P/E 4.33 0.00 PEG Ratio 0.00 0.00 Price / Sales 0.19 0.04 Price / Book 0.24 0.35 EV / EBITDA 10.17 9.69
Profitability Metric 0656 CTPCY Profit Margin -13.49% 6.73% Operating Margin (TTM) -28.32% 31.92% Return on Equity -12.42% 8.50% Return on Assets -1.97% 1.63% Diluted EPS (TTM) -0.54 1.42
Growth Metric 0656 CTPCY Revenue Growth (YoY) -8.70% -2.50% Earnings Growth (YoY) -9.70% -23.20%
Dividends Metric 0656 CTPCY Dividend Yield 0.00% 0.00% Dividend / Share 0.00 0.00
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 0656 CTPCY Sortino (Composite) 1.36 1.67 Sharpe (Composite) 0.42 1.15 Calmar (Composite) 8.65 2.48 Hurst Exponent 0.5047 0.6623 Piotroski F-Score 6/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank #9,648 #13,828
Ownership Metric 0656 CTPCY % Insiders 7281.80% 0.00% % Institutions 357.70% 0.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.