Home 0548 vs 600377 0548 vs 600377: Shenzhen Expressway Co Ltd vs Jiangsu Expressway Co Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
05
0548 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary Jiangsu Expressway Co Ltd is 2.5× the market cap of Shenzhen Expressway Co Ltd. 600377 trades at a lower P/E than 0548. 600377 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 0548 600377 Current Price HK$7.39 CN¥11.75 Daily Change -1.20% -0.34% 1-Year Return 14.40% -24.44% 52-Week High HK$8.07 CN¥16.36 52-Week Low HK$6.46 CN¥11.50 50-Day MA HK$7.58 CN¥12.03 200-Day MA HK$7.28 CN¥12.86 Beta 0.33 0.46
Size & Revenue Metric 0548 600377 Market Cap $23.76B $59.19B Enterprise Value $50.20B $82.52B Revenue (TTM) $9.26B $20.29B Shares Outstanding 747.50M 3.82B Float 637.84M 1.69B Employees 6,955 4,463
Valuation Metric 0548 600377 Trailing P/E 15.00 12.91 Forward P/E 6.05 10.87 PEG Ratio 1.81 3.81 Price / Sales 2.56 2.92 Price / Book 0.61 1.43 EV / EBITDA 8.80 8.65
Profitability Metric 0548 600377 Profit Margin 12.41% 22.64% Operating Margin (TTM) 9.05% 12.30% Return on Equity 4.00% 9.21% Return on Assets 1.87% 3.83% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.44 0.91
Growth Metric 0548 600377 Revenue Growth (YoY) -5.00% -20.00% Earnings Growth (YoY) -25.40% -8.50%
Dividends Metric 0548 600377 Dividend Yield 3.28% 4.16% Dividend / Share 0.24 0.49
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 0548 600377 Sortino (Composite) 0.24 3.36 Sharpe (Composite) 0.16 0.10 Calmar (Composite) -0.96 -1.48 Hurst Exponent 0.5655 0.7354 Piotroski F-Score 5/9 5/9 Magic Formula Rank #21,076 #14,583
Ownership Metric 0548 600377 % Insiders 4778.30% 8731.30% % Institutions 1115.50% 323.30%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.