0390 vs 1802: China Railway vs OBAYASHI CORPORATION
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
0390•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$4.05
-0.98%
1802•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥3,685.00
-2.15%
Quick Summary
OBAYASHI CORPORATION is 17.1× the market cap of China Railway. 0390 pays a dividend; 1802 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 0390 | 1802 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$4.05 | ¥3,685.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.98% | -2.15% |
| 1-Year Return | 19.12% | 76.54% |
| 52-Week High | HK$5.17 | ¥4,416.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$3.34 | ¥2,071.64 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$4.46 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$4.09 | — |
| Beta | 0.55 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 0390 | 1802 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $144.10B | $2.46T |
| Enterprise Value | $498.67B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.09T | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 4.21B | — |
| Float | 12.15B | — |
| Employees | 289,250 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 0390 | 1802 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 4.21 | — |
| Forward P/E | 3.10 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 1.25 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.13 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.23 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.53 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 0390 | 1802 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 2.09% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 4.09% | — |
| Return on Equity | 5.02% | — |
| Return on Assets | 1.14% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.62 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 0390 | 1802 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -6.60% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -35.00% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 0390 | 1802 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.15% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.17 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 0390 | 1802 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.54 | 2.75 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.28 | 1.61 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.38 | 1.72 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5790 | 0.5744 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 3/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #14,671 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 0390 | 1802 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 0.00% | — |
| % Institutions | 2656.20% | — |
Compare 0390 to peers
Compare 1802 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.