034730 vs 8058: SK Holdings Co Ltd vs Mitsubishi Corporation
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
034730•KO
₩368,500.00
-0.67%
80
8058•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,952.00
-2.63%
Quick Summary
SK Holdings Co Ltd is 1.4× the market cap of Mitsubishi Corporation. 034730 pays a dividend; 8058 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 034730 | 8058 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ₩368,500.00 | ¥4,952.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.67% | -2.63% |
| 1-Year Return | 194.33% | 102.27% |
| 52-Week High | ₩422,500.00 | ¥5,712.00 |
| 52-Week Low | ₩127,300.00 | ¥2,396.95 |
| 50-Day MA | ₩346,420.00 | — |
| 200-Day MA | ₩264,857.00 | — |
| Beta | 1.08 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 034730 | 8058 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $20.20T | $14.85T |
| Enterprise Value | $68.57T | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $122.70T | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 54.52M | — |
| Float | 36.25M | — |
| Employees | 0 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 034730 | 8058 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.16 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.80 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.90 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 034730 | 8058 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 1.30% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 0.96% | — |
| Return on Equity | 2.84% | — |
| Return on Assets | 0.32% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.00 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 034730 | 8058 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 1.20% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 69.00% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 034730 | 8058 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.17% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 8000.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 034730 | 8058 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.96 | 3.31 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 5.76 | 1.97 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 5.46 | 4.45 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5559 | 0.6014 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #24,827 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 034730 | 8058 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 2542.90% | — |
| % Institutions | 1972.30% | — |
Compare 034730 to peers
Compare 8058 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.