0267 vs 7911: Citic Pacific vs TOPPAN Holdings Inc.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
0267•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$12.82
-1.00%
7911•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,664.00
+1.24%
Quick Summary
TOPPAN Holdings Inc. is 3.5× the market cap of Citic Pacific. 0267 pays a dividend; 7911 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 0267 | 7911 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$12.82 | ¥4,664.00 |
| Daily Change | -1.00% | 1.24% |
| 1-Year Return | 43.72% | 20.15% |
| 52-Week High | HK$13.07 | ¥5,823.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$9.12 | ¥3,554.34 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$12.04 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$11.89 | — |
| Beta | 0.88 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 0267 | 7911 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $380.21B | $1.35T |
| Enterprise Value | $1.65T | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $939.41B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 29.09B | — |
| Float | 21.03B | — |
| Employees | 193,011 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 0267 | 7911 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 5.68 | — |
| Forward P/E | 6.52 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 1.76 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.40 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.42 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.24 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 0267 | 7911 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 6.25% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 29.13% | — |
| Return on Equity | 7.93% | — |
| Return on Assets | 1.45% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 2.32 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 0267 | 7911 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -3.70% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -25.00% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 0267 | 7911 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.51% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.58 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 0267 | 7911 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 6.13 | 1.53 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 2.52 | 0.91 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 3.18 | 5.92 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5892 | 0.5927 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #17,222 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 0267 | 7911 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 7312.10% | — |
| % Institutions | 1359.00% | — |
Compare 0267 to peers
Compare 7911 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.