0152 vs 4666: Shenzhen International Holdings Ltd vs PARK24 Co.,Ltd.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
01
0152•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$7.29
-0.95%
4666•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥1,970.00
+0.00%
Quick Summary
PARK24 Co.,Ltd. is 20.8× the market cap of Shenzhen International Holdings Ltd. 0152 pays a dividend; 4666 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 0152 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$7.29 | ¥1,970.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.95% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | -7.49% | -0.68% |
| 52-Week High | HK$9.29 | ¥2,319.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$7.03 | ¥1,713.00 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$8.61 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$8.33 | — |
| Beta | 0.94 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 0152 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $17.77B | $370.01B |
| Enterprise Value | $75.85B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.35B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.44B | — |
| Float | 1.39B | — |
| Employees | 8,839 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 0152 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 7.90 | — |
| Forward P/E | 18.45 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.09 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.50 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.48 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 0152 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 13.76% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 8.47% | — |
| Return on Equity | 5.03% | — |
| Return on Assets | 0.87% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.33 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 0152 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 8.00% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -21.90% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 0152 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.28% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.46 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 0152 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.78 | 1.17 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.66 | 0.53 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.96 | 7.04 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5760 | 0.6270 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #24,499 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 0152 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 4334.10% | — |
| % Institutions | 2240.30% | — |
Compare 0152 to peers
Compare 4666 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.