0152 vs 200429: Shenzhen International Holdings Ltd vs Guangdong Provincial Expressway Development Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

Shenzhen International Holdings Ltd

0152•Hong Kong Stock Exchange

HK$7.29

-0.95%

Industrials

Hong Kong

$17.77B

Guangdong Provincial Expressway Development Co Ltd

200429•SHE

HK$8.93

+0.00%

Industrials

China

$26.51B

Quick Summary

Guangdong Provincial Expressway Development Co Ltd is 1.5× the market cap of Shenzhen International Holdings Ltd. 0152 trades at a lower P/E than 200429. 200429 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric	0152	200429
Current Price	HK$7.29	HK$8.93
Daily Change	-0.95%	0.00%
1-Year Return	-7.49%	14.49%
52-Week High	HK$9.29	HK$9.18
52-Week Low	HK$7.03	HK$7.81
50-Day MA	HK$8.61	HK$8.92
200-Day MA	HK$8.33	HK$8.65
Beta	0.94	-0.06

Size & Revenue

Metric	0152	200429
Market Cap	$17.77B	$26.51B
Enterprise Value	$75.85B	$33.49B
Revenue (TTM)	$16.35B	$4.47B
Shares Outstanding	2.44B	348.75M
Float	1.39B	842.43M
Employees	8,839	3,029

Valuation

Metric	0152	200429
Trailing P/E	7.90	9.02
Forward P/E	18.45	11.89
PEG Ratio	0.00	0.00
Price / Sales	1.09	5.93
Price / Book	0.50	1.46
EV / EBITDA	12.48	6.74

Profitability

Metric	0152	200429
Profit Margin	13.76%	40.30%
Operating Margin (TTM)	8.47%	13.84%
Return on Equity	5.03%	18.17%
Return on Assets	0.87%	6.74%
Diluted EPS (TTM)	1.33	0.99

Growth

Metric	0152	200429
Revenue Growth (YoY)	8.00%	3.70%
Earnings Growth (YoY)	-21.90%	22.00%

Dividends

Metric	0152	200429
Dividend Yield	6.28%	6.76%
Dividend / Share	0.46	0.60

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric	0152	200429
Sortino (Composite)	-0.78	3.77
Sharpe (Composite)	-0.66	1.80
Calmar (Composite)	-0.96	3.84
Hurst Exponent	0.5763	0.6266
Piotroski F-Score	5/9	5/9
Magic Formula Rank	#24,499	#8,843

Ownership

Metric	0152	200429
% Insiders	4334.10%	378.50%
% Institutions	2240.30%	553.00%

Compare 0152 to peers

0152 vs 3750 0152 vs 0267 0152 vs 0019 0152 vs 1919 0152 vs 0001

Compare 200429 to peers

200429 vs 300750 200429 vs 300274 200429 vs 600150 200429 vs 601816 200429 vs 601919

Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.