Home 0107 vs 600377 0107 vs 600377: Sichuan Expressway Co Ltd vs Jiangsu Expressway Co Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
01
0107 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary Jiangsu Expressway Co Ltd is 2.8× the market cap of Sichuan Expressway Co Ltd. 0107 trades at a lower P/E than 600377. 0107 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 0107 600377 Current Price HK$5.76 CN¥11.75 Daily Change 0.00% -0.34% 1-Year Return 38.80% -24.44% 52-Week High HK$5.79 CN¥16.36 52-Week Low HK$4.15 CN¥11.50 50-Day MA HK$5.58 CN¥12.03 200-Day MA HK$5.19 CN¥12.86 Beta 0.50 0.46
Size & Revenue Metric 0107 600377 Market Cap $21.23B $59.19B Enterprise Value $53.67B $82.52B Revenue (TTM) $8.76B $20.29B Shares Outstanding 895.32M 3.82B Float 1.07B 1.69B Employees 4,548 4,463
Valuation Metric 0107 600377 Trailing P/E 10.85 12.91 Forward P/E 4.53 10.87 PEG Ratio 0.38 3.81 Price / Sales 2.39 2.92 Price / Book 0.75 1.43 EV / EBITDA 13.80 8.65
Profitability Metric 0107 600377 Profit Margin 17.28% 22.64% Operating Margin (TTM) 13.77% 12.30% Return on Equity 7.58% 9.21% Return on Assets 2.38% 3.83% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.40 0.91
Growth Metric 0107 600377 Revenue Growth (YoY) -11.00% -20.00% Earnings Growth (YoY) -41.80% -8.50%
Dividends Metric 0107 600377 Dividend Yield 5.24% 4.16% Dividend / Share 0.30 0.49
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 0107 600377 Sortino (Composite) 4.76 3.47 Sharpe (Composite) 2.09 0.21 Calmar (Composite) 3.86 -1.08 Hurst Exponent 0.5706 0.7354 Piotroski F-Score 6/9 5/9 Magic Formula Rank #19,736 #14,587
Ownership Metric 0107 600377 % Insiders 3122.00% 8731.30% % Institutions 2096.30% 323.30%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.