0083 vs 1925: Sino Land vs DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
0083•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$11.76
-1.51%
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 28.7× the market cap of Sino Land. 0083 pays a dividend; 1925 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 0083 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$11.76 | ¥4,852.00 |
| Daily Change | -1.51% | -1.36% |
| 1-Year Return | 54.13% | -4.80% |
| 52-Week High | HK$13.26 | ¥5,710.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$7.78 | ¥4,763.31 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$11.98 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$10.53 | — |
| Beta | 0.55 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 0083 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $113.62B | $3.26T |
| Enterprise Value | $61.93B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.51B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 9.48B | — |
| Float | 3.69B | — |
| Employees | 9,700 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 0083 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 29.22 | — |
| Forward P/E | 12.67 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.34 | — |
| Price / Sales | 11.94 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.65 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.42 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 0083 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 39.23% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 31.07% | — |
| Return on Equity | 2.19% | — |
| Return on Assets | 1.08% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.24 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 0083 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 34.50% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -20.30% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 0083 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.91% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.58 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 0083 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.24 | -1.59 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.47 | -1.32 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 5.14 | -4.41 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5880 | 0.5586 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #21,805 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 0083 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6098.00% | — |
| % Institutions | 995.60% | — |
Compare 0083 to peers
Compare 1925 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.