0038 vs 6326: First Tractor Co Ltd vs KUBOTA CORPORATION
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
00
0038•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$8.20
-0.97%
6326•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥2,571.00
-1.40%
Quick Summary
KUBOTA CORPORATION is 170.8× the market cap of First Tractor Co Ltd. 0038 pays a dividend; 6326 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 0038 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$8.20 | ¥2,571.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.97% | -1.40% |
| 1-Year Return | 45.13% | 58.54% |
| 52-Week High | HK$10.40 | ¥3,242.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$5.65 | ¥1,523.82 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$9.16 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$8.07 | — |
| Beta | 1.23 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 0038 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $15.64B | $2.67T |
| Enterprise Value | $9.65B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.82B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 391.94M | — |
| Float | 575.16M | — |
| Employees | 7,011 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 0038 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 10.24 | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.05 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.40 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.45 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.05 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.63 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 0038 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 7.50% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -32.69% | — |
| Return on Equity | 10.74% | — |
| Return on Assets | 2.54% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.74 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 0038 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.10% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 15.10% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 0038 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.16% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.27 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 0038 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.54 | 2.03 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.24 | 1.14 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.10 | 2.83 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5578 | 0.5535 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #16,091 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 0038 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 0.00% | — |
| % Institutions | 3313.50% | — |
Compare 0038 to peers
Compare 6326 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.