002960 vs 6744: Jade Bird Fire Alarm vs NOHMI BOSAI LTD.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
00
002960•SHE
CN¥12.08
-0.74%
67
6744•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,110.00
-2.49%
Quick Summary
NOHMI BOSAI LTD. is 21.1× the market cap of Jade Bird Fire Alarm. 002960 pays a dividend; 6744 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 002960 | 6744 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥12.08 | ¥4,110.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.74% | -2.49% |
| 1-Year Return | 11.54% | 26.96% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥13.37 | ¥4,610.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥9.44 | ¥3,158.33 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥11.55 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥11.26 | — |
| Beta | 0.82 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 002960 | 6744 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.60B | $223.97B |
| Enterprise Value | $9.44B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.70B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 879.81M | — |
| Float | 435.21M | — |
| Employees | 5,587 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 002960 | 6744 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 32.57 | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 2.26 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.67 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.06 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 002960 | 6744 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 6.81% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 3.67% | — |
| Return on Equity | 5.01% | — |
| Return on Assets | 2.07% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.37 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 002960 | 6744 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.60% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 347.20% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 002960 | 6744 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.23% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.15 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 002960 | 6744 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.08 | 0.76 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.68 | 0.16 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.08 | 0.12 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5282 | 0.6260 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 3/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #17,860 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 002960 | 6744 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 5241.90% | — |
| % Institutions | 489.70% | — |
Compare 002960 to peers
Compare 6744 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.