Home 002835 vs BCO 002835 vs BCO: Shenzhen TVT Digital Technology Co Ltd vs Brinks Company Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Brinks Company is 1.3× the market cap of Shenzhen TVT Digital Technology Co Ltd. 002835 trades at a lower P/E than BCO. 002835 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 002835 BCO Current Price CN¥15.68 $114.38 Daily Change -1.32% 2.43% 1-Year Return -3.98% 30.66% 52-Week High CN¥19.52 $135.58 52-Week Low CN¥15.05 $82.06 50-Day MA — $124.21 200-Day MA — $110.37 Beta 0.30 1.09
Size & Revenue Metric 002835 BCO Market Cap $3.30B $4.45B Enterprise Value $2.80B $9.35B Revenue (TTM) $1.10B $4.87B Shares Outstanding 219.49M 41.14M Float 86.36M 40.72M Employees — 63,600
Valuation Metric 002835 BCO Trailing P/E 19.05 22.78 Forward P/E — 17.27 PEG Ratio — 1.16 Price / Sales 3.00 0.85 Price / Book 2.67 15.86 EV / EBITDA 16.30 8.20
Profitability Metric 002835 BCO Profit Margin 15.51% 3.80% Operating Margin (TTM) 15.72% 12.94% Return on Equity 14.46% 58.52% Return on Assets 6.34% 5.30% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.79 1.97
Growth Metric 002835 BCO Revenue Growth (YoY) -9.20% 9.10% Earnings Growth (YoY) -41.30% 86.00%
Dividends Metric 002835 BCO Dividend Yield 207.00% 0.94% Dividend / Share 0.32 1.01
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 002835 BCO Sortino (Composite) -0.40 6.57 Sharpe (Composite) -0.30 1.87 Calmar (Composite) -0.97 0.27 Hurst Exponent 0.5273 0.5911 Piotroski F-Score — 6/9 Magic Formula Rank — #11,640
Ownership Metric 002835 BCO % Insiders 61.86% 119.70% % Institutions 0.19% 9959.50%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.