Sign up for free insights newsletter

002769 vs 600406: Shenzhen Prolto Supply Chain Management Co Ltd vs NARI Technology Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.

CN¥10.73
+1.61%
China
$3.70B
CN¥26.81
-0.22%
China
$215.33B

Quick Summary

NARI Technology Co Ltd is 58.1× the market cap of Shenzhen Prolto Supply Chain Management Co Ltd. 600406 pays a dividend; 002769 does not.

Price & Performance

Metric002769600406
Current PriceCN¥10.73CN¥26.81
Daily Change1.61%-0.22%
1-Year Return60.63%15.06%
52-Week HighCN¥14.24CN¥30.70
52-Week LowCN¥6.74CN¥21.30
50-Day MACN¥27.19
200-Day MACN¥24.06
Beta0.430.51

Size & Revenue

Metric002769600406
Market Cap$3.70B$215.33B
Enterprise Value$3.38B$196.32B
Revenue (TTM)$684.70M$63.43B
Shares Outstanding373.32M8.03B
Float260.40M3.30B
Employees11,131

Valuation

Metric002769600406
Trailing P/E26.81
Forward P/E17.1024.75
Price / Sales5.413.40
Price / Book3.074.38
EV / EBITDA10.6220.53

Profitability

Metric002769600406
Profit Margin-0.60%12.59%
Operating Margin (TTM)55.19%15.25%
Return on Equity-2.84%16.75%
Return on Assets2.76%6.16%
Diluted EPS (TTM)-0.011.00

Growth

Metric002769600406
Revenue Growth (YoY)-28.90%16.70%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-58.70%9.10%

Dividends

Metric002769600406
Dividend Yield2.17%
Dividend / Share0.58

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric002769600406
Sortino (Composite)0.500.76
Sharpe (Composite)1.972.14
Calmar (Composite)0.100.58
Hurst Exponent0.55920.6342
Piotroski F-Score7/9
Magic Formula Rank#11,341

Ownership

Metric002769600406
% Insiders40.63%6164.00%
% Institutions1.22%1293.30%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.