Home 002625 vs BAESF 002625 vs BAESF: Kuang Chi Technologies Co Ltd vs BAE Systems PLC Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Kuang Chi Technologies Co Ltd and BAE Systems PLC are similar in size. BAESF trades at a lower P/E than 002625. 002625 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 002625 BAESF Current Price CN¥39.87 $30.82 Daily Change -0.23% 1.42% 1-Year Return -0.80% 35.95% 52-Week High CN¥57.57 $31.09 52-Week Low CN¥37.35 $21.16 50-Day MA CN¥43.28 $28.89 200-Day MA CN¥46.17 $25.87 Beta 0.55 -0.01
Size & Revenue Metric 002625 BAESF Market Cap $85.13B $86.06B Enterprise Value $81.69B $93.68B Revenue (TTM) $1.88B $28.34B Shares Outstanding 2.15B 2.93B Float 1.41B 2.87B Employees 2,424 111,400
Valuation Metric 002625 BAESF Trailing P/E 119.73 32.25 Forward P/E 0.00 24.63 PEG Ratio — 3.44 Price / Sales 45.17 3.04 Price / Book 9.02 5.45 EV / EBITDA 109.47 16.47
Profitability Metric 002625 BAESF Profit Margin 38.24% 7.28% Operating Margin (TTM) 36.12% 10.15% Return on Equity 7.86% 18.14% Return on Assets 4.05% 4.53% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.33 0.91
Growth Metric 002625 BAESF Revenue Growth (YoY) 56.50% 6.70% Earnings Growth (YoY) 24.60% 8.70%
Dividends Metric 002625 BAESF Dividend Yield 48.00% 1.18% Dividend / Share 0.23 0.36
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 002625 BAESF Sortino (Composite) 0.49 2.73 Sharpe (Composite) -0.18 1.56 Calmar (Composite) -1.14 4.39 Hurst Exponent 0.6883 0.6323 Piotroski F-Score 6/9 8/9 Magic Formula Rank #21,101 #17,429
Ownership Metric 002625 BAESF % Insiders 3636.80% 45.00% % Institutions 392.40% 7274.30%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.