Home 002468 vs 9699 002468 vs 9699: STO Express Co Ltd vs Hangzhou Sf Intra City Industrial Co Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
96
9699 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary STO Express Co Ltd is 2.5× the market cap of Hangzhou Sf Intra City Industrial Co Ltd. 002468 trades at a lower P/E than 9699.
Price & Performance Metric 002468 9699 Current Price CN¥17.18 HK$11.28 Daily Change -4.71% -1.05% 1-Year Return 53.94% 41.18% 52-Week High CN¥19.48 HK$18.94 52-Week Low CN¥10.23 HK$7.89 50-Day MA CN¥13.99 HK$12.52 200-Day MA CN¥15.03 HK$13.37 Beta 0.09 1.64
Size & Revenue Metric 002468 9699 Market Cap $26.33B $10.35B Enterprise Value $34.65B $7.33B Revenue (TTM) $55.59B $22.90B Shares Outstanding 1.53B 742.49M Float 567.76M 276.76M Employees 9,293 2,067
Valuation Metric 002468 9699 Trailing P/E 22.93 33.29 Forward P/E 16.53 0.00 PEG Ratio 0.99 — Price / Sales 0.47 0.45 Price / Book 2.68 2.75 EV / EBITDA 20.15 20.70
Profitability Metric 002468 9699 Profit Margin 2.46% 1.21% Operating Margin (TTM) 3.83% 1.25% Return on Equity 13.62% 8.90% Return on Assets 4.07% 3.43% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.75 0.23
Growth Metric 002468 9699 Revenue Growth (YoY) 24.40% 42.80% Earnings Growth (YoY) 67.40% 93.90%
Dividends Metric 002468 9699 Dividend Yield 0.00% — Dividend / Share 0.00 —
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 002468 9699 Sortino (Composite) 14.39 -0.22 Sharpe (Composite) 5.59 -0.22 Calmar (Composite) 5.06 -1.82 Hurst Exponent 0.5030 0.6246 Piotroski F-Score 8/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank #15,693 #17,027
Ownership Metric 002468 9699 % Insiders 6186.80% 6638.60% % Institutions 394.50% 414.30%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.