002372 vs 5938: Zhejiang Weixing New Building Materials Co Ltd vs LIXIL Corporation
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
00
CN¥10.64
+0.38%
5938•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥1,615.50
-0.58%
Quick Summary
LIXIL Corporation is 30.4× the market cap of Zhejiang Weixing New Building Materials Co Ltd. 002372 pays a dividend; 5938 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 002372 | 5938 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥10.64 | ¥1,615.50 |
| Daily Change | 0.38% | -0.58% |
| 1-Year Return | -13.50% | 2.12% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥12.58 | ¥1,943.32 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥9.97 | ¥1,568.82 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥11.56 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥10.88 | — |
| Beta | 0.68 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 002372 | 5938 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $16.89B | $512.81B |
| Enterprise Value | $14.51B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.38B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 1.59B | — |
| Float | 550.45M | — |
| Employees | 4,594 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 002372 | 5938 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 22.57 | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 3.14 | — |
| Price / Book | 3.45 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.50 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 002372 | 5938 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 13.76% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 12.06% | — |
| Return on Equity | 14.46% | — |
| Return on Assets | 7.91% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.47 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 002372 | 5938 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -19.20% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -37.80% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 002372 | 5938 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.25% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.45 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 002372 | 5938 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.13 | -0.33 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.03 | -0.40 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.88 | -1.14 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6072 | 0.6278 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #9,116 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 002372 | 5938 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6354.10% | — |
| % Institutions | 700.50% | — |
Compare 002372 to peers
Compare 5938 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.