002352 vs 2384: S.F. Holding Co. Ltd vs SBS Holdings,Inc.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
002352•SHE
CN¥36.70
-2.29%
2384•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,155.00
-1.31%
Quick Summary
S.F. Holding Co. Ltd is 1.2× the market cap of SBS Holdings,Inc.. 002352 pays a dividend; 2384 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 002352 | 2384 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥36.70 | ¥4,155.00 |
| Daily Change | -2.29% | -1.31% |
| 1-Year Return | -14.79% | 48.77% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥50.70 | ¥4,415.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥35.71 | ¥2,651.07 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥37.50 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥40.48 | — |
| Beta | 0.52 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 002352 | 2384 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $184.95B | $153.71B |
| Enterprise Value | $196.49B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $308.23B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 4.80B | — |
| Float | 2.47B | — |
| Employees | 158,761 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 002352 | 2384 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 16.53 | — |
| Forward P/E | 14.90 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 1.46 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.60 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.91 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.95 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 002352 | 2384 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 3.61% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 4.64% | — |
| Return on Equity | 10.99% | — |
| Return on Assets | 4.26% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 2.22 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 002352 | 2384 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.00% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 4.90% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 002352 | 2384 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.37% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.89 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 002352 | 2384 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.03 | 2.16 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.74 | 1.32 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.85 | 3.75 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5616 | 0.5667 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #10,913 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 002352 | 2384 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 5876.90% | — |
| % Institutions | 993.90% | — |
Compare 002352 to peers
Compare 2384 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.