Home 002310 vs TMRAF 002310 vs TMRAF: Beijing Orient Landscape Co Ltd vs Tomra Systems ASA Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Beijing Orient Landscape Co Ltd is 5.1× the market cap of Tomra Systems ASA. 002310 trades at a lower P/E than TMRAF. TMRAF pays a dividend; 002310 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 002310 TMRAF Current Price CN¥2.92 $13.00 Daily Change -2.34% 0.12% 1-Year Return 45.27% -11.28% 52-Week High CN¥3.84 $17.29 52-Week Low CN¥1.96 $11.04 50-Day MA CN¥2.80 — 200-Day MA CN¥2.49 — Beta 0.17 1.44
Size & Revenue Metric 002310 TMRAF Market Cap $17.52B $3.45B Enterprise Value $18.14B $4.09B Revenue (TTM) $348.60M $1.32B Shares Outstanding 6.00B 295.40M Float 5.09B 202.91M Employees 1,200 —
Valuation Metric 002310 TMRAF Trailing P/E 0.00 32.42 Forward P/E 0.00 24.83 PEG Ratio 0.00 — Price / Sales 50.25 2.62 Price / Book 11.68 5.10 EV / EBITDA -12.14 15.61
Profitability Metric 002310 TMRAF Profit Margin 0.00% 7.06% Operating Margin (TTM) 19.69% 16.83% Return on Equity -1132.90% 15.60% Return on Assets -9.41% 5.38% Diluted EPS (TTM) -0.25 0.36
Growth Metric 002310 TMRAF Revenue Growth (YoY) -15.50% -3.90% Earnings Growth (YoY) -98.90% -11.60%
Dividends Metric 002310 TMRAF Dividend Yield — 193.00% Dividend / Share — 0.23
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 002310 TMRAF Sortino (Composite) 1.02 0.64 Sharpe (Composite) 0.28 0.39 Calmar (Composite) 0.57 0.93 Hurst Exponent 0.5612 0.4562 Piotroski F-Score 5/9 —
Ownership Metric 002310 TMRAF % Insiders 1964.10% 0.10% % Institutions 1877.30% 83.75%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.