Sign up for free insights newsletter

002244 vs CRBJF: Hangzhou Binjiang Real Estate Group Co Ltd vs China Resources Land Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.

CN¥10.53
+4.05%
China
$32.76B
CR
CRBJFUnited States
$3.80
+0.00%
United States
$28.38B

Quick Summary

Hangzhou Binjiang Real Estate Group Co Ltd is 1.2× the market cap of China Resources Land Ltd. CRBJF trades at a lower P/E than 002244. CRBJF offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric002244CRBJF
Current PriceCN¥10.53$3.80
Daily Change4.05%0.00%
1-Year Return0.57%
52-Week HighCN¥12.55$3.98
52-Week LowCN¥9.00$3.80
50-Day MACN¥10.69
200-Day MACN¥10.67
Beta0.78

Size & Revenue

Metric002244CRBJF
Market Cap$32.76B$28.38B
Enterprise Value$34.35B$374.32B
Revenue (TTM)$93.88B$281.44B
Shares Outstanding3.11B7.13B
Float1.10B2.89B
Employees1,664

Valuation

Metric002244CRBJF
Trailing P/E9.847.37
Forward P/E2.26
PEG Ratio0.27
Price / Sales0.350.10
Price / Book1.060.68
EV / EBITDA3.488.09

Profitability

Metric002244CRBJF
Profit Margin3.52%9.03%
Operating Margin (TTM)12.38%14.59%
Return on Equity10.77%8.04%
Return on Assets2.30%2.56%
Diluted EPS (TTM)1.070.54

Growth

Metric002244CRBJF
Revenue Growth (YoY)21.00%-6.60%
Earnings Growth (YoY)14.70%-11.70%

Dividends

Metric002244CRBJF
Dividend Yield0.81%462.00%
Dividend / Share0.080.18

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric002244CRBJF
Sortino (Composite)0.33
Sharpe (Composite)3.58
Calmar (Composite)0.84
Hurst Exponent0.5116
Piotroski F-Score8/9
Magic Formula Rank#10,173

Ownership

Metric002244CRBJF
% Insiders6546.50%59.55%
% Institutions929.40%17.75%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.