002236 vs 2331: Zhejiang Dahua Technology Co Ltd vs ALSOK CO.,LTD.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
00
002236•SHE
CN¥19.16
-0.05%
2331•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥1,242.00
+1.26%
Quick Summary
ALSOK CO.,LTD. is 9.5× the market cap of Zhejiang Dahua Technology Co Ltd.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 002236 | 2331 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥19.16 | ¥1,242.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.05% | 1.26% |
| 1-Year Return | 22.90% | 10.76% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥21.50 | ¥1,304.50 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥15.16 | ¥985.46 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥18.05 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥18.68 | — |
| Beta | 0.70 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 002236 | 2331 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $62.91B | $598.39B |
| Enterprise Value | $55.31B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32.74B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 3.29B | — |
| Float | 1.64B | — |
| Employees | 23,891 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 002236 | 2331 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 15.82 | — |
| Forward P/E | 18.45 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.92 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.65 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.59 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 002236 | 2331 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 11.77% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 17.20% | — |
| Return on Equity | 10.12% | — |
| Return on Assets | 2.93% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.21 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 002236 | 2331 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 1.00% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -17.10% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 002236 | 2331 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 002236 | 2331 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.62 | 1.23 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.45 | 0.85 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 9.58 | 1.63 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6734 | 0.6425 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #14,653 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 002236 | 2331 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 4914.10% | — |
| % Institutions | 1039.00% | — |
Compare 002236 to peers
Compare 2331 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.