002208 vs 2202: Hefei Urban Construction Development Co Ltd vs China Vanke Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
00
CN¥12.71
+2.83%
2202•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$3.07
+0.66%
Quick Summary
China Vanke Co Ltd is 5.1× the market cap of Hefei Urban Construction Development Co Ltd. 2202 trades at a lower P/E than 002208.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 002208 | 2202 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥12.71 | HK$3.07 |
| Daily Change | 2.83% | 0.66% |
| 1-Year Return | 89.14% | -47.97% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥16.52 | HK$5.88 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥6.30 | HK$2.88 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥14.20 | HK$3.40 |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥11.14 | HK$4.28 |
| Beta | 1.38 | 0.85 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 002208 | 2202 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.23B | $52.62B |
| Enterprise Value | $18.15B | $371.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.62B | $233.43B |
| Shares Outstanding | 803.29M | 2.21B |
| Float | 323.30M | 8.68B |
| Employees | 861 | 127,638 |
Valuation
| Metric | 002208 | 2202 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 7.27 | 19.76 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 0.17 |
| Price / Sales | 1.19 | 0.23 |
| Price / Book | 1.54 | 0.27 |
| EV / EBITDA | 55.97 | 22.44 |
Profitability
| Metric | 002208 | 2202 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -2.13% | -37.94% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 3.91% | -82.99% |
| Return on Equity | -0.94% | -27.68% |
| Return on Assets | 0.20% | -0.88% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -0.23 | -10.43 |
Growth
| Metric | 002208 | 2202 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -58.90% | -41.60% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -93.90% | -23.70% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 002208 | 2202 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 5.88 | -1.20 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 2.45 | 2.30 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.46 | -0.52 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5879 | 0.5361 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 1/9 | 2/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #25,889 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 002208 | 2202 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6090.10% | 0.00% |
| % Institutions | 133.30% | 2578.40% |
Compare 002208 to peers
Compare 2202 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.