Sign up for free insights newsletter

002152 vs 300551: GRG Banking Equipment Co Ltd vs Shanghai GuAo Electronic Technology Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.

CN¥12.11
+0.41%
China
$30.07B
CN¥14.00
-1.06%
China
$4.49B

Quick Summary

GRG Banking Equipment Co Ltd is 6.7× the market cap of Shanghai GuAo Electronic Technology Co Ltd. 300551 trades at a lower P/E than 002152. 002152 pays a dividend; 300551 does not.

Price & Performance

Metric002152300551
Current PriceCN¥12.11CN¥14.00
Daily Change0.41%-1.06%
1-Year Return0.17%71.78%
52-Week HighCN¥14.97CN¥20.75
52-Week LowCN¥11.31CN¥7.84
50-Day MACN¥12.65CN¥17.54
200-Day MACN¥13.12CN¥14.35
Beta0.671.43

Size & Revenue

Metric002152300551
Market Cap$30.07B$4.49B
Enterprise Value$17.78B$4.62B
Revenue (TTM)$12.06B$190.16M
Shares Outstanding2.48B340.06M
Float1.15B276.07M
Employees33,765433

Valuation

Metric002152300551
Trailing P/E34.600.00
Forward P/E15.770.00
PEG Ratio0.76
Price / Sales2.4923.61
Price / Book2.4010.85
EV / EBITDA11.27-86.94

Profitability

Metric002152300551
Profit Margin7.14%-171.32%
Operating Margin (TTM)10.50%-32.42%
Return on Equity7.22%-55.43%
Return on Assets2.30%-7.63%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.35-0.96

Growth

Metric002152300551
Revenue Growth (YoY)10.70%-47.90%
Earnings Growth (YoY)11.80%53.20%

Dividends

Metric002152300551
Dividend Yield3.07%
Dividend / Share0.37

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric002152300551
Sortino (Composite)1.260.37
Sharpe (Composite)0.560.11
Calmar (Composite)1.14-0.54
Hurst Exponent0.66560.5673
Piotroski F-Score4/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#13,942

Ownership

Metric002152300551
% Insiders5502.80%2739.20%
% Institutions422.00%214.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.