002050 vs FLS: Zhejiang Sanhua Co Ltd vs FLSmidth & Co.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
002050•SHE
CN¥45.54
-0.52%
FLS•Nasdaq Copenhagen
DKK 542.00
+3.83%
Quick Summary
Zhejiang Sanhua Co Ltd is 6.7× the market cap of FLSmidth & Co.. FLS trades at a lower P/E than 002050. 002050 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 002050 | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥45.54 | DKK 542.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.52% | 3.83% |
| 1-Year Return | 89.12% | 84.73% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥58.56 | DKK 611.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥24.50 | DKK 291.20 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥47.71 | DKK 533.07 |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥43.31 | DKK 464.02 |
| Beta | 0.91 | 1.37 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 002050 | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $191.34B | $28.57B |
| Enterprise Value | $172.57B | $30.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $31.01B | $14.61B |
| Shares Outstanding | 3.73B | 54.21M |
| Float | 1.89B | 45.87M |
| Employees | 19,090 | 5,296 |
Valuation
| Metric | 002050 | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 44.15 | 42.92 |
| Forward P/E | 31.06 | 20.79 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 2.29 |
| Price / Sales | 6.17 | 1.96 |
| Price / Book | 6.07 | 3.04 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.96 | 11.87 |
Profitability
| Metric | 002050 | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 13.10% | 0.00% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 15.52% | 12.45% |
| Return on Equity | 15.93% | 6.71% |
| Return on Assets | 7.10% | 4.72% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.03 | 12.28 |
Growth
| Metric | 002050 | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -5.40% | -3.90% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -16.00% | 38.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | 002050 | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.87% | 0.75% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.40 | 4.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 002050 | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.71 | 11.18 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.99 | 3.69 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.59 | 2.06 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6003 | 0.7523 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #11,971 |
Ownership
| Metric | 002050 | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 4404.70% | 1529.70% |
| % Institutions | 1076.10% | 3521.70% |
Compare 002050 to peers
Compare FLS to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.