001965 vs 2353: Merchant Express Class A vs NIPPON PARKING DEVELOPMENT Co.,Ltd.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
00
001965•SHE
CN¥9.12
-1.51%
23
2353•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥275.00
+0.00%
Quick Summary
NIPPON PARKING DEVELOPMENT Co.,Ltd. is 1.5× the market cap of Merchant Express Class A. 001965 pays a dividend; 2353 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 001965 | 2353 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥9.12 | ¥275.00 |
| Daily Change | -1.51% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | -30.17% | 20.66% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥13.13 | ¥303.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥8.72 | ¥226.94 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥9.69 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥10.17 | — |
| Beta | -0.03 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 001965 | 2353 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $62.11B | $90.62B |
| Enterprise Value | $107.36B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.36B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 6.80B | — |
| Float | 1.90B | — |
| Employees | 7,836 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 001965 | 2353 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 13.85 | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 4.65 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.85 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.66 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 001965 | 2353 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 34.51% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 10.01% | — |
| Return on Equity | 5.66% | — |
| Return on Assets | 1.07% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.66 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 001965 | 2353 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 28.20% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -49.50% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 001965 | 2353 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.03% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.37 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 001965 | 2353 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.75 | 1.28 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.39 | 0.32 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.51 | 2.70 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5274 | 0.5882 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #24,170 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 001965 | 2353 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 7205.50% | — |
| % Institutions | 1464.90% | — |
Compare 001965 to peers
Compare 2353 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.