0016 vs 1925: Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd vs DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
0016•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$133.00
-4.04%
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 8.2× the market cap of Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. 0016 pays a dividend; 1925 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 0016 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$133.00 | ¥4,852.00 |
| Daily Change | -4.04% | -1.36% |
| 1-Year Return | 87.59% | -4.80% |
| 52-Week High | HK$146.00 | ¥5,710.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$71.55 | ¥4,763.31 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$134.04 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$106.38 | — |
| Beta | 0.83 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 0016 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $397.58B | $3.26T |
| Enterprise Value | $477.02B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $92.49B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.90B | — |
| Float | 1.35B | — |
| Employees | 38,000 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 0016 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 18.08 | — |
| Forward P/E | 14.95 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.96 | — |
| Price / Sales | 4.30 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.63 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.36 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 0016 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 23.79% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 24.34% | — |
| Return on Equity | 3.66% | — |
| Return on Assets | 2.08% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 8.12 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 0016 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 32.00% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 36.20% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 0016 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.78% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 3.78 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 0016 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.33 | -1.59 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.92 | -1.32 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 4.23 | -4.41 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6290 | 0.5586 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #19,291 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 0016 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 5495.80% | — |
| % Institutions | 1471.20% | — |
Compare 0016 to peers
Compare 1925 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.