0012 vs 8802: Henderson Land vs Mitsubishi Estate Company,Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
0012•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$30.08
-1.12%
8802•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,495.00
-3.93%
Quick Summary
Mitsubishi Estate Company,Limited is 31.8× the market cap of Henderson Land. 0012 pays a dividend; 8802 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 0012 | 8802 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$30.08 | ¥4,495.00 |
| Daily Change | -1.12% | -3.93% |
| 1-Year Return | 43.92% | 80.62% |
| 52-Week High | HK$35.44 | ¥5,308.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$21.20 | ¥2,439.51 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$31.85 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$29.27 | — |
| Beta | 1.15 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 0012 | 8802 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $147.95B | $4.70T |
| Enterprise Value | $207.93B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25.74B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 4.84B | — |
| Float | 1.33B | — |
| Employees | 10,078 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 0012 | 8802 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 24.45 | — |
| Forward P/E | 19.19 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.71 | — |
| Price / Sales | 5.75 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.46 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.70 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 0012 | 8802 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 21.96% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 14.77% | — |
| Return on Equity | 1.91% | — |
| Return on Assets | 0.53% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.24 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 0012 | 8802 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 20.00% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -16.20% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 0012 | 8802 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.13% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 1.26 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 0012 | 8802 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.59 | 2.89 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.38 | 1.76 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.36 | 3.53 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6073 | 0.6056 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #25,475 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 0012 | 8802 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 7286.90% | — |
| % Institutions | 879.00% | — |
Compare 0012 to peers
Compare 8802 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.