000951 vs 6301: Sinotruk Jinan Truck Co Ltd vs KOMATSU LTD.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
000951•SHE
CN¥23.82
-2.89%
63
6301•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥6,700.00
-1.64%
Quick Summary
KOMATSU LTD. is 183.2× the market cap of Sinotruk Jinan Truck Co Ltd. 000951 pays a dividend; 6301 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 000951 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥23.82 | ¥6,700.00 |
| Daily Change | -2.89% | -1.64% |
| 1-Year Return | 34.35% | 68.70% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥26.43 | ¥7,799.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥16.34 | ¥3,809.61 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥21.87 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥18.72 | — |
| Beta | 0.94 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 000951 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $27.99B | $5.13T |
| Enterprise Value | $20.03B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $57.74B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 1.17B | — |
| Float | 553.72M | — |
| Employees | 6,714 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 000951 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 16.77 | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.52 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.36 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.48 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.78 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.16 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 000951 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 2.89% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 4.33% | — |
| Return on Equity | 14.18% | — |
| Return on Assets | 3.29% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.42 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 000951 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 52.10% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 9.00% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 000951 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.37% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.83 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 000951 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 4.08 | 3.50 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 2.35 | 2.06 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 9.37 | 7.92 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5754 | 0.6765 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #7,197 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 000951 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 5161.40% | — |
| % Institutions | 1185.80% | — |
Compare 000951 to peers
Compare 6301 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.