000885 vs 4666: City Development Environment Co Ltd vs PARK24 Co.,Ltd.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
00
000885•SHE
CN¥13.70
+0.74%
4666•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥1,970.00
+0.00%
Quick Summary
PARK24 Co.,Ltd. is 42.1× the market cap of City Development Environment Co Ltd.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 000885 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥13.70 | ¥1,970.00 |
| Daily Change | 0.74% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 9.78% | -0.68% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥15.94 | ¥2,319.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥12.52 | ¥1,713.00 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥13.74 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥14.25 | — |
| Beta | 0.43 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 000885 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8.80B | $370.01B |
| Enterprise Value | $23.38B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.56B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 642.08M | — |
| Float | 218.19M | — |
| Employees | 4,573 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 000885 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 7.10 | — |
| Forward P/E | 14.04 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.34 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.92 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.85 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 000885 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 18.83% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 28.83% | — |
| Return on Equity | 13.16% | — |
| Return on Assets | 4.08% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.93 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 000885 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -11.50% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 16.50% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 000885 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 000885 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.65 | 1.17 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.35 | 0.53 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 3.84 | 7.04 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.4956 | 0.6270 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #11,940 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 000885 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6667.00% | — |
| % Institutions | 941.10% | — |
Compare 000885 to peers
Compare 4666 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.