Sign up for free insights newsletter

000885 vs 200429: City Development Environment Co Ltd vs Guangdong Provincial Expressway Development Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.

CN¥13.70
+0.74%
China
$8.80B

Quick Summary

Guangdong Provincial Expressway Development Co Ltd is 3.0× the market cap of City Development Environment Co Ltd. 000885 trades at a lower P/E than 200429. 200429 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric000885200429
Current PriceCN¥13.70HK$8.93
Daily Change0.74%0.00%
1-Year Return9.78%14.49%
52-Week HighCN¥15.94HK$9.18
52-Week LowCN¥12.52HK$7.81
50-Day MACN¥13.74HK$8.92
200-Day MACN¥14.25HK$8.65
Beta0.43-0.06

Size & Revenue

Metric000885200429
Market Cap$8.80B$26.51B
Enterprise Value$23.38B$33.49B
Revenue (TTM)$6.56B$4.47B
Shares Outstanding642.08M348.75M
Float218.19M842.43M
Employees4,5733,029

Valuation

Metric000885200429
Trailing P/E7.109.02
Forward P/E14.0411.89
PEG Ratio0.000.00
Price / Sales1.345.93
Price / Book0.921.46
EV / EBITDA6.856.74

Profitability

Metric000885200429
Profit Margin18.83%40.30%
Operating Margin (TTM)28.83%13.84%
Return on Equity13.16%18.17%
Return on Assets4.08%6.74%
Diluted EPS (TTM)1.930.99

Growth

Metric000885200429
Revenue Growth (YoY)-11.50%3.70%
Earnings Growth (YoY)16.50%22.00%

Dividends

Metric000885200429
Dividend Yield0.00%6.76%
Dividend / Share0.000.60

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric000885200429
Sortino (Composite)0.653.77
Sharpe (Composite)0.351.80
Calmar (Composite)3.843.84
Hurst Exponent0.49560.6266
Piotroski F-Score6/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#11,940#8,843

Ownership

Metric000885200429
% Insiders6667.00%378.50%
% Institutions941.10%553.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.