000828 vs 4666: Dongguan Development Holdings Co Ltd vs PARK24 Co.,Ltd.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
00
000828•SHE
CN¥9.98
-0.89%
4666•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥1,970.00
+0.00%
Quick Summary
PARK24 Co.,Ltd. is 35.7× the market cap of Dongguan Development Holdings Co Ltd. 000828 pays a dividend; 4666 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 000828 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥9.98 | ¥1,970.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.89% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | -6.99% | -0.68% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥12.20 | ¥2,319.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥9.81 | ¥1,713.00 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥10.59 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥11.12 | — |
| Beta | 0.68 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 000828 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.37B | $370.01B |
| Enterprise Value | $12.26B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.55B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 1.04B | — |
| Float | 313.67M | — |
| Employees | 971 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 000828 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 12.63 | — |
| Forward P/E | 9.78 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 6.68 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.03 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.23 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 000828 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 53.06% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -27.25% | — |
| Return on Equity | 7.92% | — |
| Return on Assets | 2.62% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.79 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 000828 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -2.70% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 6.00% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 000828 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.72% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.47 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 000828 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.53 | 1.17 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.69 | 0.53 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.75 | 7.04 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.4787 | 0.6270 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 8/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #14,041 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 000828 | 4666 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 7087.60% | — |
| % Institutions | 183.90% | — |
Compare 000828 to peers
Compare 4666 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.