Sign up for free insights newsletter

000786 vs CARR: Beijing New Building Materials Public Ltd Co vs Carrier Global Corp

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥25.67
+0.39%
China
$43.70B
CA
CARRUnited States
$61.32
+2.70%
United States
$52.94B

Quick Summary

Carrier Global Corp is 1.2× the market cap of Beijing New Building Materials Public Ltd Co. 000786 trades at a lower P/E than CARR. 000786 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric000786CARR
Current PriceCN¥25.67$61.32
Daily Change0.39%2.70%
1-Year Return-14.43%2.37%
52-Week HighCN¥30.00$80.73
52-Week LowCN¥23.42$50.36
50-Day MACN¥26.86$60.32
200-Day MACN¥25.77$61.08
Beta0.831.32

Size & Revenue

Metric000786CARR
Market Cap$43.70B$52.94B
Enterprise Value$38.52B$66.91B
Revenue (TTM)$25.28B$18.95B
Shares Outstanding1.70B835.43M
Float994.38M783.51M
Employees16,13347,000

Valuation

Metric000786CARR
Trailing P/E14.9237.48
Forward P/E8.2222.62
PEG Ratio0.001.52
Price / Sales1.732.43
Price / Book1.603.83
EV / EBITDA8.7418.02

Profitability

Metric000786CARR
Profit Margin11.50%6.82%
Operating Margin (TTM)6.34%1.92%
Return on Equity10.90%10.93%
Return on Assets5.72%3.53%
Diluted EPS (TTM)1.721.61

Growth

Metric000786CARR
Revenue Growth (YoY)-1.50%-6.00%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-36.70%-97.80%

Dividends

Metric000786CARR
Dividend Yield2.68%1.49%
Dividend / Share0.690.92

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric000786CARR
Sortino (Composite)0.830.72
Sharpe (Composite)0.360.52
Calmar (Composite)0.721.50
Hurst Exponent0.52680.6742
Piotroski F-Score6/94/9
Magic Formula Rank#7,360#18,819

Ownership

Metric000786CARR
% Insiders4566.60%615.20%
% Institutions1371.60%9088.40%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.