000528 vs 6301: Guangxi Liugong Machinery Co Ltd vs KOMATSU LTD.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
000528•SHE
CN¥9.54
-1.24%
63
6301•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥6,700.00
-1.64%
Quick Summary
KOMATSU LTD. is 264.1× the market cap of Guangxi Liugong Machinery Co Ltd. 000528 pays a dividend; 6301 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 000528 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥9.54 | ¥6,700.00 |
| Daily Change | -1.24% | -1.64% |
| 1-Year Return | -12.64% | 68.70% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥12.84 | ¥7,799.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥9.20 | ¥3,809.61 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥10.51 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥11.23 | — |
| Beta | 0.74 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 000528 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $19.41B | $5.13T |
| Enterprise Value | $21.73B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32.97B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.04B | — |
| Float | 1.44B | — |
| Employees | 17,009 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 000528 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 14.44 | — |
| Forward P/E | 15.27 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.36 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.59 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.07 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.29 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 000528 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 4.44% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 3.85% | — |
| Return on Equity | 6.70% | — |
| Return on Assets | 2.12% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.66 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 000528 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 11.50% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -33.40% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 000528 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.83% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.27 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 000528 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.73 | 3.50 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.64 | 2.06 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.62 | 7.92 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6696 | 0.6765 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #14,316 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 000528 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 2697.80% | — |
| % Institutions | 1526.20% | — |
Compare 000528 to peers
Compare 6301 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.