000425 vs 6301: XCMG Construction Machinery Co Ltd vs KOMATSU LTD.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
000425•SHE
CN¥9.95
-2.45%
63
6301•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥6,700.00
-1.64%
Quick Summary
KOMATSU LTD. is 43.8× the market cap of XCMG Construction Machinery Co Ltd. 000425 pays a dividend; 6301 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 000425 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥9.95 | ¥6,700.00 |
| Daily Change | -2.45% | -1.64% |
| 1-Year Return | 11.80% | 68.70% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥12.66 | ¥7,799.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥7.66 | ¥3,809.61 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥11.25 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥10.53 | — |
| Beta | 0.77 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 000425 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $116.90B | $5.13T |
| Enterprise Value | $147.04B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $99.79B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 11.75B | — |
| Float | 7.67B | — |
| Employees | 27,791 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 000425 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 17.46 | — |
| Forward P/E | 11.06 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 1.46 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.17 | — |
| Price / Book | 2.00 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.31 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 000425 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 6.61% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.66% | — |
| Return on Equity | 10.95% | — |
| Return on Assets | 3.20% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.57 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 000425 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 21.00% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 6.50% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 000425 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.76% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.18 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 000425 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.59 | 3.50 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.44 | 2.06 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -2.08 | 7.92 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6733 | 0.6765 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #16,478 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 000425 | 6301 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 3684.00% | — |
| % Institutions | 1982.80% | — |
Compare 000425 to peers
Compare 6301 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.