0004 vs 1925: Wharf Holdings vs DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
0004•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$21.80
-1.54%
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 49.3× the market cap of Wharf Holdings. 0004 pays a dividend; 1925 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 0004 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$21.80 | ¥4,852.00 |
| Daily Change | -1.54% | -1.36% |
| 1-Year Return | 17.58% | -4.80% |
| 52-Week High | HK$27.10 | ¥5,710.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$18.62 | ¥4,763.31 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$24.14 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$23.16 | — |
| Beta | 0.23 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 0004 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $66.19B | $3.26T |
| Enterprise Value | $63.31B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.00B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 3.06B | — |
| Float | 957.24M | — |
| Employees | 5,900 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 0004 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 1083.00 | — |
| Forward P/E | 19.80 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 1.65 | — |
| Price / Sales | 6.02 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.44 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 71.38 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 0004 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 0.46% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 45.25% | — |
| Return on Equity | 0.08% | — |
| Return on Assets | 1.63% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -0.01 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 0004 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.80% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 1121.20% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 0004 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.84% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.40 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 0004 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.62 | -1.59 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.10 | -1.32 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.52 | -4.41 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6166 | 0.5586 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #18,863 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 0004 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6861.50% | — |
| % Institutions | 479.40% | — |
Compare 0004 to peers
Compare 1925 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.