000088 vs 3816: Shenzhen Yan Tian Port Holdings Co Ltd vs MISC
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
00
000088•SHE
CN¥4.55
-0.22%
38
3816•KLSE
MYR 8.17
+0.49%
Quick Summary
MISC is 1.5× the market cap of Shenzhen Yan Tian Port Holdings Co Ltd. 000088 pays a dividend; 3816 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 000088 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥4.55 | MYR 8.17 |
| Daily Change | -0.22% | 0.49% |
| 1-Year Return | -1.52% | 19.12% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥5.37 | MYR 8.59 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥4.38 | MYR 6.74 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥4.58 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥4.54 | — |
| Beta | 0.43 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 000088 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $23.55B | $35.71B |
| Enterprise Value | $23.50B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $796.56M | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 5.20B | — |
| Float | 1.35B | — |
| Employees | 895 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 000088 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 16.18 | — |
| Forward P/E | 29.15 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 29.57 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.31 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.58 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 000088 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 177.79% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 16.79% | — |
| Return on Equity | 8.37% | — |
| Return on Assets | 0.19% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.28 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 000088 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 10.30% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -0.10% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 000088 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.78% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.22 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 000088 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.20 | 1.19 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.06 | 0.63 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.76 | 1.09 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.4380 | 0.5279 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #16,368 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 000088 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 7955.80% | — |
| % Institutions | 297.90% | — |
Compare 000088 to peers
Compare 3816 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.