Home 000039 vs CMPO 000039 vs CMPO: China International Marine Containers Group Ltd vs CompoSecure, Inc. Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary China International Marine Containers Group Ltd is 8.6× the market cap of CompoSecure, Inc.. CMPO trades at a lower P/E than 000039. 000039 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 000039 CMPO Current Price CN¥11.64 $16.51 Daily Change -3.80% -5.93% 1-Year Return 55.20% 55.02% 52-Week High CN¥13.69 $26.00 52-Week Low CN¥7.54 $10.35 50-Day MA CN¥11.77 $21.13 200-Day MA CN¥9.41 $17.80 Beta 1.04 1.01
Size & Revenue Metric 000039 CMPO Market Cap $62.77B $7.28B Enterprise Value $67.28B $4.65B Revenue (TTM) $156.61B $160.68M Shares Outstanding 2.30B 289.42M Float 2.25B 99.01M Employees 20,404 1,000
Valuation Metric 000039 CMPO Trailing P/E 582.00 0.00 Forward P/E 26.81 20.16 PEG Ratio 4.98 — Price / Sales 0.40 45.30 Price / Book 1.29 31.34 EV / EBITDA 7.98 8.83
Profitability Metric 000039 CMPO Profit Margin 0.14% -134.84% Operating Margin (TTM) 3.22% 5.63% Return on Equity 1.98% 0.00% Return on Assets 2.30% 1.20% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.02 -2.34
Growth Metric 000039 CMPO Revenue Growth (YoY) -18.80% -42.50% Earnings Growth (YoY) -68.10% -60.30%
Dividends Metric 000039 CMPO Dividend Yield 1.48% 0.00% Dividend / Share 0.18 0.00
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 000039 CMPO Sortino (Composite) 2.39 0.73 Sharpe (Composite) 1.32 0.42 Calmar (Composite) 2.46 0.52 Hurst Exponent 0.5268 0.6166 Piotroski F-Score 4/9 4/9 Magic Formula Rank #21,175 #13,240
Ownership Metric 000039 CMPO % Insiders 2599.80% 2069.10% % Institutions 838.00% 4087.10%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.