Home 000002 vs SUHJY 000002 vs SUHJY: China Vanke Co Ltd Class A vs Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
Quick Summary China Vanke Co Ltd Class A and Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd are similar in size. 000002 trades at a lower P/E than SUHJY. SUHJY pays a dividend; 000002 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 000002 SUHJY Current Price CN¥3.96 $17.25 Daily Change 0.00% -2.49% 1-Year Return -45.83% 88.52% 52-Week High CN¥7.18 $18.55 52-Week Low CN¥3.81 $9.08 50-Day MA CN¥4.50 $17.14 200-Day MA CN¥5.63 $13.60 Beta 0.85 0.83
Size & Revenue Metric 000002 SUHJY Market Cap $47.25B $51.81B Enterprise Value $322.91B $61.96B Revenue (TTM) $233.43B $92.49B Shares Outstanding 9.72B 2.90B Float 8.68B 1.35B Employees 127,638 38,000
Valuation Metric 000002 SUHJY Trailing P/E 0.00 18.43 Forward P/E 34.72 15.41 PEG Ratio 0.27 0.99 Price / Sales 0.20 0.56 Price / Book 0.40 0.65 EV / EBITDA 22.44 15.63
Profitability Metric 000002 SUHJY Profit Margin -37.94% 23.79% Operating Margin (TTM) -82.99% 24.34% Return on Equity -27.68% 3.66% Return on Assets -0.88% 2.08% Diluted EPS (TTM) -7.45 0.97
Growth Metric 000002 SUHJY Revenue Growth (YoY) -41.60% 32.00% Earnings Growth (YoY) -23.70% 36.20%
Dividends Metric 000002 SUHJY Dividend Yield — 2.71% Dividend / Share — 3.78
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 000002 SUHJY Sortino (Composite) -1.28 4.90 Sharpe (Composite) -1.23 2.93 Calmar (Composite) 2.35 7.78 Hurst Exponent 0.5951 0.6561 Piotroski F-Score 2/9 7/9 Magic Formula Rank — #12,862
Ownership Metric 000002 SUHJY % Insiders 3535.40% 0.00% % Institutions 758.10% 0.80%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.