Home 000002 vs CTPNV 000002 vs CTPNV: China Vanke Co Ltd Class A vs CTP N.V. Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
Quick Summary China Vanke Co Ltd Class A is 6.1× the market cap of CTP N.V.. 000002 trades at a lower P/E than CTPNV. CTPNV pays a dividend; 000002 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 000002 CTPNV Current Price CN¥3.96 €16.66 Daily Change 0.00% 2.21% 1-Year Return -45.83% 2.08% 52-Week High CN¥7.18 €19.60 52-Week Low CN¥3.81 €14.14 50-Day MA CN¥4.50 €16.94 200-Day MA CN¥5.63 €17.92 Beta 0.85 0.94
Size & Revenue Metric 000002 CTPNV Market Cap $47.25B $7.79B Enterprise Value $322.91B $16.37B Revenue (TTM) $233.43B $972.50M Shares Outstanding 9.72B 485.04M Float 8.68B 129.31M Employees 127,638 924
Valuation Metric 000002 CTPNV Trailing P/E 0.00 7.11 Forward P/E 34.72 16.13 PEG Ratio 0.27 2.76 Price / Sales 0.20 8.01 Price / Book 0.40 0.92 EV / EBITDA 22.44 9.83
Profitability Metric 000002 CTPNV Profit Margin -37.94% 111.24% Operating Margin (TTM) -82.99% 63.98% Return on Equity -27.68% 13.68% Return on Assets -0.88% 2.23% Diluted EPS (TTM) -7.45 2.26
Growth Metric 000002 CTPNV Revenue Growth (YoY) -41.60% 5.70% Earnings Growth (YoY) -23.70% -38.30%
Dividends Metric 000002 CTPNV Dividend Yield — 3.99% Dividend / Share — 0.63
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 000002 CTPNV Sortino (Composite) -1.28 1.28 Sharpe (Composite) -1.23 3.64 Calmar (Composite) 2.35 3.86 Hurst Exponent 0.5951 0.5953 Piotroski F-Score 2/9 4/9 Magic Formula Rank — #21,157
Ownership Metric 000002 CTPNV % Insiders 3535.40% 7330.30% % Institutions 758.10% 1701.50%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.