Home 000002 vs CRBJF 000002 vs CRBJF: China Vanke Co Ltd Class A vs China Resources Land Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
Quick Summary China Vanke Co Ltd Class A is 1.7× the market cap of China Resources Land Ltd. 000002 trades at a lower P/E than CRBJF. CRBJF pays a dividend; 000002 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 000002 CRBJF Current Price CN¥3.96 $3.80 Daily Change 0.00% 0.00% 1-Year Return -45.83% — 52-Week High CN¥7.18 $3.98 52-Week Low CN¥3.81 $3.80 50-Day MA CN¥4.50 — 200-Day MA CN¥5.63 — Beta 0.85 —
Size & Revenue Metric 000002 CRBJF Market Cap $47.25B $28.38B Enterprise Value $322.91B $374.32B Revenue (TTM) $233.43B $281.44B Shares Outstanding 9.72B 7.13B Float 8.68B 2.89B Employees 127,638 —
Valuation Metric 000002 CRBJF Trailing P/E 0.00 7.37 Forward P/E 34.72 — PEG Ratio 0.27 — Price / Sales 0.20 0.10 Price / Book 0.40 0.68 EV / EBITDA 22.44 8.09
Profitability Metric 000002 CRBJF Profit Margin -37.94% 9.03% Operating Margin (TTM) -82.99% 14.59% Return on Equity -27.68% 8.04% Return on Assets -0.88% 2.56% Diluted EPS (TTM) -7.45 0.54
Growth Metric 000002 CRBJF Revenue Growth (YoY) -41.60% -6.60% Earnings Growth (YoY) -23.70% -11.70%
Dividends Metric 000002 CRBJF Dividend Yield — 462.00% Dividend / Share — 0.18
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 000002 CRBJF Sortino (Composite) -1.28 — Sharpe (Composite) -1.23 — Calmar (Composite) 2.35 — Hurst Exponent 0.5951 — Piotroski F-Score 2/9 —
Ownership Metric 000002 CRBJF % Insiders 3535.40% 59.55% % Institutions 758.10% 17.75%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.