000002 vs 1030: China Vanke Co Ltd Class A vs Seazen Group Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
000002•SHE
CN¥3.96
+0.00%
10
1030•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$2.19
+1.39%
Quick Summary
China Vanke Co Ltd Class A is 3.0× the market cap of Seazen Group Ltd. 000002 trades at a lower P/E than 1030.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 000002 | 1030 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥3.96 | HK$2.19 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 1.39% |
| 1-Year Return | -45.83% | 5.29% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥7.18 | HK$2.81 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥3.81 | HK$1.85 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥4.50 | HK$2.23 |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥5.63 | HK$2.34 |
| Beta | 0.85 | 2.31 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 000002 | 1030 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $47.25B | $15.64B |
| Enterprise Value | $322.91B | $75.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $233.43B | $53.14B |
| Shares Outstanding | 9.72B | 7.24B |
| Float | 8.68B | 2.66B |
| Employees | 127,638 | 18,954 |
Valuation
| Metric | 000002 | 1030 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 30.86 |
| Forward P/E | 34.72 | 0.00 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.27 | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | 0.20 | 0.29 |
| Price / Book | 0.40 | 0.29 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.44 | 9.16 |
Profitability
| Metric | 000002 | 1030 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -37.94% | 0.74% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -82.99% | 13.41% |
| Return on Equity | -27.68% | 0.38% |
| Return on Assets | -0.88% | 1.55% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -7.45 | 0.03 |
Growth
| Metric | 000002 | 1030 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -41.60% | -43.90% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -23.70% | -27.90% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 000002 | 1030 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.28 | 0.57 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.23 | 5.74 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.35 | 2.57 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5951 | 0.6100 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 2/9 | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #16,783 |
Ownership
| Metric | 000002 | 1030 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 3535.40% | 6369.10% |
| % Institutions | 758.10% | 518.80% |
Compare 000002 to peers
Compare 1030 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.